Waterproofing inspection log

Field record

Stage by stage, what was seen before the work was covered — which is the record nobody can reconstruct afterwards.

The last chance to see it

Waterproofing is inspected once and then buried under protection board, screed and eventually a building. If nobody wrote down what the substrate looked like or how the drain was detailed, that information is gone. Stage, location, what was seen, and who cleared it to be covered.

It approves nothing

No method, no cure time, no temperature limit, no acceptance criterion, and no photograph stored. The tool records what was observed and who said the work could be covered — it does not say so itself.

Around it

Work that does not match the documents is the nonconformance log. An inspection you have to book is the inspection request log, and finished work that has to be protected is the temporary protection checklist.

A record of what somebody observed. It publishes no installation method, cure time, temperature limit or acceptance criterion, stores no photographs, and clears no work to be covered — it records that somebody else did. Everything runs on your device.

Questions people ask

Does it say how the system should be installed?
No. It publishes no installation method, no cure time, no temperature limit, no thickness and no acceptance criterion. Those are in the manufacturer's literature and your specification, and a website paraphrasing them onto a field sheet is how a wrong number gets installed.
What does “cleared to cover” mean?
That somebody said the work could be covered, and who that was. The tool clears nothing itself, and the options make the source explicit — by you, by others, not yet, or no. It is a record of a decision, not the decision.
Can I attach photographs?
No photograph is stored by this product. There is a photo reference field for your own filename or number, so the sheet points at the image in whatever system holds it. That keeps the record small and keeps your photographs where you put them.
Why record the stage rather than just the location?
Because a waterproofing failure is almost always traced to one stage — the substrate, a detail, a termination — and a log that only says “bay 2, looked fine” cannot answer the question. The stage list covers the sequence most systems follow, with an “other” for the ones that do not.