Corrective action plan tracker

Register

Every finding, who owns it, what is being done about it, and what came back — one list per facility.

It states no deadline

Corrective action plan formats and submission deadlines differ by agency, by program and by state, and a survey response is exactly the wrong place for software to be confident. So the due date is the one you were given or the one you are working to, and the tool prints no requirement of its own.

Accepted is something you record

The stage note says it on the stage: somebody told you it was accepted, and you wrote it down. This tool decides nothing about what any agency did, and it makes no determination that any facility is compliant. An internal list that quietly claimed acceptance would be worse than keeping no list at all.

Where findings come from

Most of them arrive from somewhere else in this product: a safety round, an inspection, a survey readiness gap, or a log where somebody flagged something. Individual obligations that just need doing belong in the corrective action tracker; this is for the plan you are reporting against.

A general administrative tracker. CompliMaint states no agency requirement, submission deadline or format, and “accepted” is a state you record after somebody tells you so — nothing here decides that any agency accepted anything, or that any facility is compliant. Everything runs on your device.

Questions people ask

Does this tool know what my agency requires?
No, and it says so rather than guessing. Corrective action plan formats, submission deadlines and what counts as acceptable evidence differ by agency, by program and by state — and a deadline invented here would end up printed on somebody's compliance record. Put in the date you were given or the one you are working to.
What does 'accepted' mean here?
That somebody told you the plan was accepted and you recorded it. Nothing in this tool decides that an agency accepted anything; the stage itself carries that note so the person clicking it reads it. The distinction matters because an internal list that claims acceptance is worse than no list.
Can I use this for findings that did not come from an agency?
Yes — it is deliberately a general administrative tracker. An internal audit finding, an insurer's recommendation, a consultant's report and a regulator's citation all have the same shape: a finding, an owner, an action, a date and a response. The source field is where you say which it was.
How is this different from the corrective action tracker?
The corrective action tracker holds individual obligations — a thing is wrong and somebody must fix it, often raised straight from an inspection or a log. This holds a PLAN you are submitting or reporting against: a set of findings, with responses and evidence, tracked through submission and acceptance. Different lifecycles, different audiences.